Big Bang is Epic Fail

Big Bang equals fail. If you check a physics book you can find numerous objections to the big bang theory. Big bang phrase started out as a joke by Fred Hoyle. Big bang is basically universe starts from this very small hot dense area and expands from there. The big bang is sometimes said to come from nothing, which creationist argues is illogical, then they bring out intelligent design. The universe has been around for a very long time and in all likelihood much longer than what we believe it to be. Two ideas are said to support the big bang theory. One is the red shift and two is background microwave radiation.

Red shift of known spectral lines do not lead you automatically to an expanding universe for three reasons. One is many other causes of red shifts exist. Two since we only have been observing the universe for a short period of time, even if what we are observing is it moving away, it could start moving towards us simply because the effects of revolutional periods of that body, of which could last thousands to millions of years, are difficult to observe. And third Hubble's constant is not even constant and can lead to unreal results like faster than light travel.

Ok, on to background microwave radiation, despite the hype, this is not proof of the expanding universe theory. Simply put, the big bang causes background radiation, therefore background microwave radiation is proof of the big bang, but in reality err no. That is circular logic. The actual cause is not what people think it is. Non scientists don't understand the blackbody equation, nor what could give rise to a radiant blackbody. For one to observe a constant microwave background radiation everywhere, the universe would have to be in thermal equilibrium, which it is not. I could go into more details about the red shift and microwave cosmic radiation, but noone reads these posts anyways.

Atheist and theists argue over the whole origin of the universe thing. Atheist will cite big bang. Creationist theist will cite 6000 year old universe/earth theory. Both are epicly wrong. Non scientist atheist don't understand the math and ideas involved, like really understand it. That requires an education in physics to be honest. You can't just check wikipedia and expect to get it. Scientist usually just accepts it because they don't have a real interest in the area and it's the best theory that physical science has. What the creationist argues is much worse though and not even close to being right. Their argument is based on the age of historical records and thus what we have of recorded human history. A primitive culture writes down universe was created by God and therefore people just assume universe must have been created around that time, which is an illogical conclusion.

The actual reality of the universe is that black holes give birth to suns, to solar systems, and we have some actual evidence of such. The energy released from a black hole is under high pressure and high temperatures, so it is big-bang like. The big bang theory cannot explain the origin of universe without considering the most massive objects in the universe. Black holes(the big ones) are actually older than the measured age of the universe, inferred from radioactive isotope measurement. You can't just ignore reality, which the big bang theory does.